« Researchers Claim USB Security Is Broken | Main | Oregon Attorney General Filed Lawsuit Against Makers Of 5-Hour Energy Drink »

Tuesday, August 05, 2014

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Chanson de Roland

It is a new day, where privacy and the human dignity that goes with it are of yesterday and where the law does not grant users any proprietary rights in their own information. So today there is nothing to make what OKCupid did either immoral or illegal, at least not illegal if it included the requisite disclaimers in its Terms of Service, which nobody reads and which most could not understand as to its meaning and its legal effect even if they did read it.

So welcome to the new day, where we share and, indeed, must share everything and where the private self may extend no further than one’s inner thoughts, if even that far, and where the public self, which really isn’t all and who we are, is the only self that is permitted and is the only self that one really has, and that self belongs to everyone but you. So you don’t exist any more a distinct and precious individual but only as node of information for the profit and benefit of others and subject to their control.

Rich F

I am a user who believes that what they've done is unethical. And I find their cavalier and unapologetic stance on this disturbing.

I first became aware of their questionable ethics a couple years ago on April Fool's Day. They added a new option which appeared when a user logged on. If a user clicked on it, it appeared as if you were viewing the inbox of one of your contacts, so you could see all the messages they were receiving from other users. They fabricated those messages, and they were quite offensive. For example, it appeared that one of the women I had been communicating with had been exchanging nude photos with some guy, and he was commenting on them. There were many messages of this nature to be viewed. Even if it had been clear that this was an April Fool's Day prank (which is wasn't -- they made it look very real), this still would have been an unprofessional and offensive thing to do. The fact that people could have and probably did take this seriously means that potential relationships could have been destroyed.

Now they are at it again, totally insensitive to the effect they have on people's lives. This is not a matter of whether they are allowed to be doing research, this is about what that research entails. It's unethical to screw with people's lives, lead them to believe that someone is a good match when they are not, that they are a bad match when they could be a good one, to change the content of what a user has put in his or her profile, to read their personal messages for the sake of their so-called research.

Yes, it is a new day, but that doesn't mean this type of thing is not immoral. And it's all the more reason why people have to stand up against it.

George

When social networking websites act like this (e.g., OKCupid and Facebook), it's abusive behavior since we consumers provide the content (e.g., personal information, likes, messages, photos, video, etc.) that make their social websites operate... content these social networking websites NEED to operate. A reader shared this article:

The Problem With OKCupid Is The Problem With The Social Web
http://kottke.org/14/08/the-problem-with-okcupid-is-the-problem-with-the-social-web

And, these social sites operate, thanks to their users' information, quite profitably. Facebook's worldwide revenues are over $7 billion, almost as large as the National Football League.

We are truly starting to see the dark side of the Web.

George
Editor
http://ivebeenmugged.typepad.com

Rich F

I stopped using Facebook years ago as soon as I detected what they were up to. For reasons like the ones we are discussing, I do not use any social networking sites other than dating sites and I'm just about ready to dump this particular one. Let's see... dishonest, arrogant, insensitive, immature, and unprofessional -- I wouldn't take that from a date and I'm not going to take it from a dating site either.

George

Rich F:

Thank you very much for sharing your experiences and insight. I agree with you. The behavior was unethical. The unapologetic and arrogant attitude was definitely disturbing.

George
Editor
http://ivebeenmugged.typepad.com

BobbyG

people seem to be forgetting the OkCupid IS FREE TO USE and if you choose to sign up you do so accepting THEIR TERMS AND CONDITIONS. nobody is forcing you to use this service at all. and yes, some of the methods are questionable, but they are not illegal and the intentions were probably good ones and THESE EXPERIMENTS WERE PERFORMED ON USERS THAT VOLUNTARILY SIGNED UP FOR A FREE SERVICE. I haven't read their T&O but their's probably something in there that gives them permission to do this kind of thing. People who get very upset about this kind of thing should completely read any terms and conditions that they accept and understand. AND STOP COMPLAINING when something free doesn't do things the way you like.

Steve

Let's be clear. If the service is free, YOU are the product.

George

BobbyG and Steve:

Thanks for sharing your opinions. Some reactions to your comments:

Free? There are paid features, as the OKC Legal Terms state:
https://www.okcupid.com/legal/terms

Last I checked, there is no law preventing customers of a free service from commenting or voicing their opinions about that service. Open-minded business executives would welcome such feedback to improve their service; not blame the customers that keep them in business.

As commenters on the OKC blog post said, the unannounced changes screwed with people's lives. And, ethical research matters. There are several professional research guidelines OKC could have followed. You might read:

What Is Ethics in Research And Why Is It Important?
http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/

OkCupid Experiment May Violate FTC Rules on Deceptive Practices
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/07/30/us-internet-okcupid-idUSKBN0FZ03K20140730

The article mentioned Rudder saying that OKC had received only 10 complaints. Huh? There seem to be lots of complaints in the comments thread on his blog post.

George
Editor
http://ivebeenmugged.typepad.com

Ari

I think it's one thing for websites with large volumes of data (like OKC and Facebook) to conduct social experiments, and quite another for individuals to do so using their profiles. This blogger essentially came to the same conclusion as OKC that photos matter much, much more than the write-up of your profile. http://middleagedteen.blogspot.com/2013/07/a-social-experiment.html

Vinny

I have mixed feelings on these 'experiments'.

On the one hand, the "love is blind" experiment is relatively harmless, other than to show that, regardless of what people may say, both men and women use vision as the first "filtering" criteria of mate selection. Or, as I've often said to my friends, "you're not going to sleep with someone who disgusts you". That is, unless you have zero standards or no self-respect.

On the other hand, I find other "experiments", such as changing the percentages, to be akin to lying. That type of behavior steps over a line IMO. Lying to your customers is simply unacceptable.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Follow

  • Updates via E-mail RSS Feed Updates via Twitter Updates via Facebook

About

  • Bloggers' Rights at EFF
  • George Jenkins, author of the I've Been Mugged Blog

..

  • © 2007 - 2017. George Jenkins. All Rights Reserved.

.

  • <$MTStatsScript$>